Descartes Third Meditation :: essays research papers

meditation IIIIn Descartes Third Meditation, he establishes arguments to prove the cosmea of paragon. Descartes believes in Cogito Ergo Sum this means I turn over therefore I am. The I in this sentence means the soul. Descartes believes the existence of the mind is disclose known than the existence of the body. If my soul thinks then I exist. The Cogito proves the existence of self-importance or the mind this is not the same for the theory of divinity fudge. Descartes has two arguments in the Third meditation. The arguments are the cause of his idea of God and the cause of his existence now.In the third meditation Descartes uses his existence as an example to come across give away whether God exist. Descartes explanation is whatever he perceived top and distinct is true. The idea of the existence of God could cause been caused by some function out side of himself. Something had to put the idea of God in his mind for him to think about the existence of God. Descartes says, I must examine whether there is a God, and, if there is, whether he can be a deceiver. Descartes has to prove that God exists and that he is no deceiver. Descartes then explains that the idea of God is the idea of a undefiled or Supreme Being. A perfect universe could have set this idea in our minds. He discovers that a perfect thing exists and that perfect being is defined as God. Descartes says, All these attributes are such that, the more carefully I concentrate on them, the less feasible it seems that they could have originated from me alone. So from what has been said it must be concluded that God necessarily exists. Descartes also reveals that God is not a deceiver. Descartes knows that a perfect being has no faults. Deception depends on some defect or fault. Therefore, if a perfect being has no faults then that perfect being can not be a deceiver.