Critical Analysis of Darkness at Noon by Harold Krents Essay -- Darkne

Critical digest of Darkness at Noon by Harold Krents In Darkness at Noon, Harold Krents vividly describes some of the everyday prejudices disabled citizens must face. Presented in an often humorous fashion, the author opens the proof refs eyes to the unrelenting ironies of indian lodges preconceived and inaccurate judgments, and their long r each(prenominal)ing effect on his life. Krents begins his sample by pointing out to the reader that he stopnot charm himself, and thus, often has to depend upon the viewpoints of differents. He states To date it has not been narcissistic. The average reader may not be aw be that the word narcissistic means, too in love with oneself. It is helpful for the reader to keep this first expression in mind as he continues through the article, and hears Krents descriptions of societys viewpoints. Krents points out three particular judgments that are often passed on him by the public. There are those who assume that since I goatt see, I obviously cannot hear then, others know that of course I can hear, but believe that I cant talk and last The toughest misconception of all is the view that because I cant see, I cant work. It is surely an unfortunate irony, that the disabled citizen must not nevertheless deal with his own burdens, but also, the imaginary ones placed upon him by society. Krents supports his statements apply appealing illustrative stories with effective imagery. Krents chooses to use words which are effective, and relay a definite scene to the reader. Some examples are enunciating each word very carefully, ..if the dread word is spoken, the ticket agents retina will immediately detachand my saint-like disposition deserted meI finally blurted out He creates i... ...is not even present. Krents other recollections are also effective. They all work together to demonstrate the wild fears and misconceptions of some members of society. Krents mistake is attributing the opinions of a misled few to tho se of the entire nation. Although the reader is moved by Krents many stories and examples, the lack of objectivity in the essay leaves the reader with doubts. Krents theme - that if handicapped persons were viewed fairly their disability would be not be apparent- is one that the reader is aware of and wants to believe in. Yet, Krents own pessimistic tones overshadow the greater good. The reader is left with the uneatable feeling that this essay may be nothing more than a very unconfident and dissatisfied man, attempting to pin his disappointments and failures on society, so that he may feel better about himself.