Comparing Crime and Punishment and Notes from the Underground :: comparison compare contrast essays

Crime and Punishment and Notes from the cloak-and-dagger Crime and Punishment and Notes from the Underground Fyodor Dostoyevskys stories are stories of a sort of rebirth. He weaves a tale of consummate(a) serviceman suffering and how each char conducter attempts to escape from this misery. In the apologue Crime and Punishment, he tells the story of Raskolnikov, a former student who murders an emeritus pawnbroker as an attempt to prove a theory. In Notes from the Underground, we are accustomed a chance to explore Dostoyevskys opinion of human beings. Dostoyevskys characters are truly similar, as is his stories. He puts a strong stress on the disaffection and isolation his characters feel. His characters are both brilliant and sick as mentioned in each novel, poisoned by their intelligence. In Notes from the Underground, the character, who is never given a name, writes his diary from solitude. He is spoiled by his intelligence, giving him a fierce conceitedness with which he lashes out at the world and justifies the malicious things he does. At the same sequence, though, he speaks of the doubt he feels at the value of human thought and purpose and later, of human life. He believes that intelligence, to be constantly skeptical and faithless(ly) drifting between ideas, is a curse. To be damned to see everything, distinctly as a window (and that includes things that arent meant to be seen, such as the decadence in the world) or constantly seeking the meaning of things elusive. Dostoyevsky thought that manhood are evil, destructive and irrational. In Crime and Punishment, we see Raskolnikov caught between conclude and will, the human needs for personal freedom and the need to submit to authority. He spends most of the first two parts stuck between wanting to act and wanting to observe. After he acts and murders the old woman, he spends much time contemplating confession. Raskolnikov seems trapped in his world although there is really nothing keepin g him back he chooses not to flee and not to confess, tho muted acts as though hes suffocation (perhaps guilt?)In both novels defeat seems inevitable. both(prenominal) characters believe that normal man is stupid, unsatisfied and confused. Perhaps they are right, but both characters fail to see the positive aspects of humans the closest was the circumstance between the narrator of Notes from the Underground and Liza. In this scene he roughly lets the human side show, rather than the insecure, closed off person he normally is.